According to a report by news agency Reuters, the ruling bars government agencies such as the Department of Health and Human Services and the FBI from “engaging with social media companies for the purpose of soliciting, encouraging, pressuring or inducing in any way the removal of Is.” , removing, suppressing or curtailing protected free speech material under” free speech clause First Amendment to the US Constitution.
read this also
Meta has long been criticized for its lack of transparency, particularly in how the company recommends content to users and uses user data for this. Now, the company, which owns two of the largest social media networks, has released an in-depth analysis of its social media algorithms to clarify.
The EU’s Digital Markets Act is set to impose new rules on tech companies including search engines, social networking services and operating systems. Seven companies, including Google, Facebook, Amazon and TikTok, have been identified as gatekeepers and must meet specific standards. DMA aims to
The judge also banned officials, including Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Jane Easterly, head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, from engaging with the social media giant. It is to be noted that the government can communicate with social media giants in its efforts. Address illegal activity and national security threats on platforms.
The injunction is seen as a victory for Republicans who have accused the authorities of censorship.
The US government said the platforms failed to address misinformation and that their goal was to reduce misinformation about COVID vaccines to prevent preventable deaths.
Here’s what the government has to say
A white House The official was quoted as saying that the Justice Department is “reviewing the court’s injunction and will evaluate its options in this matter.”
“This administration has promoted responsible actions to protect public health, safety and security while facing challenges such as a deadly pandemic and foreign attacks on our elections. Our consistent view is that social media platforms have an important responsibility to take into account the impact their platforms have on the American people, but make free choices about the information they present,” the White House official said. Said.